Population, Health, Environment: What Works and Why
This report was commissioned to address the question of what works and what doesn’t work to make PHE programs successful – the most successful being those with the potential for scale or expansion.
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
This report was commissioned to address the question of what works and what doesn’t work to make PHE programs successful – the most successful being those with the potential for scale or expansion.
This report documents the process through which a Ugandan conservation organization, Conservation through Public Health (CTPH), successfully integrated interventions traditionally seen as from different “domains” or “sectors” for the dual purposes of (1) reducing threats to mountain gorillas and their habitat and (2) improving the well-being of local communities directly dependent upon the health of the former (for ecotourism and natural resource use).
As part of a project to restore Mozambique’s Gorongosa National Park, an Ecohealth program was incorporated to address health problems contributing to poverty. In 2012, a midterm evaluation was commissioned by USAID to assess the extent to which Ecohealth was reaching its objectives in providing an integrated (PHE) package of services, including family planning/reproductive health and maternal and child health interventions, and to identify “best practices” for replication and sharing with other integrated efforts worldwide.